A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS IN SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS IN SINGAPORE AND MALAYSIA
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023-06
Authors
IDRIS, Musa ODEH, Mercy Adija
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
777/5 paper analysed the systems of administration in Singapore and Malaysia from
a comparative perspective. Descriptive studies on the system of administration in
Singapore and Malaysia on separate basis bounds. However, a comparative
approach to the study of the system of administration in these two countries is
rare. This paper seek to close this knowledge-gap. The paper sought to
comparatively examine the political history, mode of entry into the civil service,
condition of service, relationship between the bureaucrats and efficiency in
service delivery. The paper is purely qualitative relaying and synthesizing existing
literature. It established that though the two countries had similar British colonial
experience, political structures and stability differ in each of these plural societies.
While Singapore operates a unicameral parliamentary system with a prime
minister and elected president, Malaysia operates a federal constitution with a
bicameral system with a prime minister and elected monarch. Although both
countries operate the British Weberian model of civil service, Singapore has a
merit-based, competitive, transparent, accountable, leaner and efficient
Bureaucratic machinery. The Weberian bureaucratic values did not match
Malaysia system with an ascriptive, less competitive, less transparent, less
accountable over bloated and less efficient bureaucracy. The paper concludes that
similarities in colonial experience, geographical contiguity and ethnic pluralism in
both countries have not translated into similarity in political stability and efficiency
in service delivery in Singapore and Malaysia.
Description
Department of Public Administration, Ahmadu Bello University,
Zaria, Nigeria