AGRARIAN STRUCTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT: A SPATIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION UNITS IN IGALALAND, KOGI STATE, NIGERIA
AGRARIAN STRUCTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT: A SPATIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION UNITS IN IGALALAND, KOGI STATE, NIGERIA
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2000-09
Authors
JOHN, ATAKPA UKOJE
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The main aim of this study is to assess the economic efficiency of farmers in the
use of agricultural production resources in southern Igalaland. In order to achieve the
aim of this study, a total of 204 fields belonging 43 farmers from ten settlements were
surveyed using prismatic compass, and a measuring tape to determine their sizes. Two
sets of questionnaire were administered to cover soeio-eeonomie characterises of the
people and their cultural practices. The Held areas were calculated. The information
thus obtained was subsequently used in the analysis of factor productivity, cost and
returns, and profitability of the crops cultivated"'by the farmers.
The result of the study showed that the farmers with an average family size of 16
persons cultivated an average farm size of 5.26 ha per household. They relied more on
non-family labour (55.7%) for the cultivation of their fields. Sole cropping was the most
dominant cropping pattern in the area because it constituted about 50 percent of the crop
enterprises and accounted for about 76 per cent of the total area cultivated by sampled
farmers. They also relied more on their savings, which accounted for 85 per cent of the
total amount of money invested in farming.
The farmers used insignificant quantities of fertilizers, insecticides and herbicides
because they were either not affordable or available or they had no knowledge of their
uses.
The small-scale farmers' households were about 58 per cent of the sampled
farmers, they cultivated only about 25 per cent of the area under cultivation. The small
farmers had an average farm size of 2.26 ha while the large-scale farmers had 13.72 ha.
\ ii
per household. The small-scale farmers were generally more efficient in the use of
production resources than the medium and large-scale farmers.
Crop yields in the area were appreciable as crops like yam, maize, rice and millet
had yields higher than average yields for Nigeria.
Labour was profitably used and returns to family and non-family labour were
generally much higher than the wage rate for the survey year. All the selected crop
enterprises were profitably cultivated. So the farmers were found to be efficient in the
use of their production resources.
The results of the production function analyses for showed that seed was the
most important variable that explained the variations in the yield of yam while labour
was the major variable that explained the variation in the yields of maize and cassava.
Both variables seed and labour, were important in explaining the variations in the
yield of rice. The results further showed that the areas of production resources could
be adjusted in the process of producing yam. maize, rice and cassava, if increase in
productivity is to be sustained.
It was recommended that for improved productivity and consequently
improved standard of living, the farmers in southern Igalaland should be provided
with basic farm inputs like seeds, fertilizer, insecticides and herbicides; services such
as tractor hiring, extension and loans; basic infrastructure including roads, clean water,
and health centres. It is therefore recommended that the provision of these
infrastructure, farm inputs and services in addition to regular data collection to update
the information about the farmers and their socio-economic life will facilitate effective
viii
future rural planning, for the area. Effective implementation of such laudable plans
will bring about the desired rural development.
Description
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL,
AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA, IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF
THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
IN GEOGRAPHY
Keywords
AGRARIAN, STRUCTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SPATIA, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, AGRICULTURAL, PRODUCTION, GALALAND,