CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF COURT MARTIAL CASES AT APPELLATE COURTS IN NIGERIA 1990- 2014
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF COURT MARTIAL CASES AT APPELLATE COURTS IN NIGERIA 1990- 2014
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2016-03
Authors
UGWU, Emmanuel Onyekachi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Court martial is a major aspect of administration of military justice. In Nigeria, courts martial
set up by the Army, Navy and Air Force have had numerous problems in the last 24 years
leading to upturning of majority of the judgments by appellate courts. Judgments of about 70
percent of court martial cases that were appealed against in Nigeria between 1990 and 2014
were upturned by appellate courts. This work discovered that the major reasons that made
appellate courts to upturn the judgments were on grounds of lack of jurisdiction, non-observance
of the principles of fair hearing and lack of diligent prosecution among others. The Nigerian
Armed Forces have lost several officers and soldiers to dismissals from courts martial of which
their dismissals and sentence of imprisonment were upturned many years after, when it was
difficult to get them back to service. This equally led to wastage of several man-hours
prosecuting such cases at high expense. These were equally accompanied by harsh comments
from justices of appellate courts which in some instances ridiculed the military justice system in
Nigeria. The research is therefore aimed at proving that between 1990 and 2014, most of the
court martial judgments were upturned on appeal based on lack of jurisdiction, non observance
of the principles of fair hearing and lack of diligent prosecution. The major objective is to ensure
that courts martial follow the prescribed procedures during trials. The research found out that
one of the major reasons that makes court martial presidents and members conduct the
procedures of the court in ways contrary to what it should be is command influence. Command
influence is the negative influence of some convening authorities which makes the members to do
his bidding at the courts martial. As a way out of the problem, the research recommended the
insulation of courts martial from command influence and ensuring that those whose avoidable
actions caused the upturning of court martial judgments on appeal get to feel the consequence of
their actions. The principal ways of insulating courts martial from command influence as
identified by the research include the Nigerian Armed Forces keying into the housing scheme of
the Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria to get a personal house for every officer at the rank of
Major. The officers are to bear the cost of the houses but to pay gradually from commission. In
this way, officers will have a house to retire to, early in their career, thereby reducing the
retirement phobia that facilitates command influence. The work equally recommended a
situation where court martial members do not get evaluation reports from convening officers of
courts martial where they are members. In the final analysis, the researcher believes that if these
measures are adopted, the upturning of judgments of courts martial by appellate courts in
Nigeria will be reduced to the barest minimum.
Description
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF POST GRADUATE STUDIES, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF LAWS DEGREE- LL.M FACULTY OF LAW, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA, NIGERIA
Keywords
CRITICAL APPRAISAL,, COURT MARTIAL CASES,, APPELLATE COURTS, NIGERIA