A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF NOUNS AND VERBS INFLECTIONAL PROCESSES OF ENGLISHAND C’LELA LANGUAGES WITH TEACHING IMPLICATION

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorTAMBA, Musa Fatimah
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T08:09:49Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T08:09:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.descriptionA RESEARCH THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIALFULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER’S OF EDUCATION IN TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE (TESL) DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, FACULTY OF EDUCATION. AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIAen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims at contrasting the nouns and verbs inflectional processes of English and C‟Lela languages with teaching implication in details to pinpoint any similarities and differences between them. To do the contrastive analysis, descriptive design was used to describe the elements of contrast in the study.4000 nouns and 4000 verbs were taken as the population for the study because the universe is heterogeneous and infinitive. Stratified sampling technique was used in arriving at the sample size of 50 nouns and 50 verbs marking a total of 100 words. The instruments used in collecting data for the study are some nouns and verbs.Four research questions are answered to achieve the objectives of the study.An inventory of nouns and verbs inflectional processes of English and C‟Lelalanguages are listed to highlight their similarities and differences. Result revealed that, there are restricted numbers of inflectional processes in each language and are used to indicate aspects of grammatical function of a word. Result reveals that there are more varieties of inflectional processes in C‟Lela language than in English language. It also reveals that they shared some properties as well as dissimilarities. English represents more irregularities in terms of plurality for nouns and affixation for verbs. C‟Lela language exhibitsdistinct plural markers for animate and inanimate nouns. The differences are the major source of difficulties for a native speaker of C‟Lela language to learn English language and vice versa, to overcome this, teaching should be effectively and efficiently managed at these different points to smooth the path for learners. Based on the findings of this study, some implications can be drawn for textbook writers, syllabus designers, learners and instructors involve in language pedagogy. Based on the findings the following recommendations were made: teachers should pay more attention to areas that exhibit points of differences, students should be taught the inflectional processes of the second language in differentiation from the first language, textbook writers should include in their text, the items identified as different and allocate more exercises and practice time during teaching and learning and curriculum designers should include the items identified as problems/difficult to the second language learner in the syllabus and allocate enough time for proper treatment of the items.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/8673
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS,en_US
dc.subjectNOUNS,en_US
dc.subjectVERBS INFLECTIONAL PROCESSES,en_US
dc.subjectENGLISHAND C’LELA LANGUAGES,en_US
dc.subjectTEACHING IMPLICATION,en_US
dc.titleA CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF NOUNS AND VERBS INFLECTIONAL PROCESSES OF ENGLISHAND C’LELA LANGUAGES WITH TEACHING IMPLICATIONen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
A CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF NOUNS AND VERBS INFLECTIONAL PROCESSES OF ENGLISHAND C'LELA LANGUAGES WITH TEACHING IMPLICATION.pdf
Size:
980.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
EDUCATION