THE LAW OF THE SEA AND NIGERIA'S MARINE POLICY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION
THE LAW OF THE SEA AND NIGERIA'S MARINE POLICY: A CRITICAL EVALUATION
No Thumbnail Available
Date
1999-07
Authors
TAGOWA, WONOTANZOKAN NZEDA
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The importance of the sea not only as a source of food and means of
transport but also as a potential source of finding solutions to many of man's social,
economic, political and ecological problems has created the impetus for the legal
division of the world's oceans into national and international jurisdictions. This legal
regime evolved historically through state practices beginning from the Spanish and
Portuguese control of the world oceans in 1493 to the signing of a broad-based and
comprehensive treaty, the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS III), in 1982. This treaty is not only a comprehensive legal instrument that
embodies one of the latest codification and progressive development of
international law, but is also a legal base for national ocean policies of nation-states.
Nigeria participated in the negotiations that led to the signing of the treaty in 1982.
She also ratified the convention on August 14, 1986, eight years before it can be into
force on November 16, 1994 This study undertakes a critical evaluation of the
influence of the'law of the sea on the emergence of a comprehensive marine policv
in Nigeria. Having done this, our neneral conclusion is that the evolution and
development of marine policy depend on the politics and global legislations on the
sea as nations struggle for share of the mass resources of the sea. This suggests
that national ocean policies must be part of national planning which have been
found to be absent in Nigeria. Besides, the complexity of the ocean medium itself
requires integrative structures of various dimensions for effective ocean policy.
Ocean policy, therefore, requires integration at the local, state and national levels as well as national development planning. There must also be integration of
international ocean relations at the regional and global levels. The most significant
specific conclusions reached from our analysis, evaluation and findings are that (I)
sectoral approach and lack of co-ordination and harmonization between institutions
of policy formulation and implementation are the major factors which impaired the
emergence of a comprehensive ocean policy in Nigeria; (ii) there is institutional
inadequacy as the country does not have a central authority that oversees ocean
affairs; (iii) there still exists a legislative vacuum as far as maritime laws are
concerned: while some existing maritime legislations are outdated and conflict with
current international practices, there are areas in which laws have not yet been
enacted; and (iv) although there is some degree of awareness as to the need for
a comprehensive ocean policy in Nigeria, there is complete lack of political will on
the part of governmental authorities to include ocean policy into national
development plans. On the basis of these conclusions, we have made some
recommendations which centre on tne national legislations for institutional
restructuring in order to enhance the evolution of an intrgrated ocean policy in
Nigeria
Description
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE POSTGRADUATE
SCHOOL, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA,
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF
PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE
(INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS)
DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE,
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES,
AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY,
ZARIA, NIGERIA
JULY, 1999
Keywords
LAW,, NIGERIA'S MARINE ,, POLICY:,, CRITICAL EVALUATION